Showing posts with label Residential Schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Residential Schools. Show all posts
June 25, 2008

Our Collective Reply


On June 11th, the Canadian federal government issued the apology to the Aboriginal peoples in Canada for the policies of assimilation with the residential schools system. It was a historic day for Canada, as well as living Residential School survivors, and their decedents. The Residential schools in Canada were operated for decades by Christian churches aimed to assimilate indigenous people into the dominant White society. Language, culture, history, and everything connected to our very being was deemed, wrong. It was from the House of Commons in Ottawa, Prime Minister Stephen Harper apologized.

Two primary objectives of the residential schools system were to remove and isolate children from the influence of their homes, families, traditions and cultures, and to assimilate them into the dominant culture. These objectives were based on the assumption aboriginal cultures and spiritual beliefs were inferior and unequal. Indeed, some sought, as it was infamously said, "to kill the Indian in the child." Today, we recognize that this policy of assimilation was wrong, has caused great harm, and has no place in our country.
- except from the apology text

When talk of the apology came up a few weeks prior to the announcement of the apology, I began to wonder what it would be like. Just a few months prior, the Australian government issued a similar apology after a new government came to power. Their apology was for the Stolen Generations, a similar policy engaged by the Australian government to “civilize” the indigenous people there. Their apology lacked in many regards, and their opposition leaders response was expected and appalling. Expected from a conservative political party, but non the less, appalling for their ignorance and deem absolved of sins.

When the government of Canada issued it’s apology, I was returning home from a trip performing my culture in Los Angels and Seattle. Sharing our ancient songs and dances to people around the world. Same songs and dances that our ancestors danced, and their ancestors. Some pre-dating the Flood time. It was with pride that I was able to come home and say we were doing such a wonderful thing for our people, but also humility that I was thankful for the opportunity.

Also at the time of the apology, my grandmother traveled to Ottawa with other Sḵwxwú7mesh elders, and my auntie accompanied her. She witnessed first hand the apology, sitting in the upper balcony above Stephen Harper. My s7el tiyaltalut (grandmother Audrey Rivers) who attended residential school for 10 years at St. Paull’s Residential School in North Vancouver, was alive and there to see the government apologize for what they had stolen from her and done to her and her people. She’s a woman of strength and humility also, in an inspiring way, was humbled to be there and welcomed the apology. This is woman who experienced horrific things, seen atrocious acts, and felt the decimation of a livelihood on her culture and language. She has forgiven the nuns for what they did to her, and she forgave the government for what they tried to accomplish. She let it go, believing it’s time to move forward, and move on.

I shocked a few friends when I said I welcomed the apology, and fully accepted it. I don’t have any “Anti-Canada” rhetoric or inflammatory language to throw back at something I believe was long over do, and somewhat genuine. I accepted the apology for all the elders who are still alive and will be able to feel the effects of the government apologizing for what they did. I welcome the apology for step taken to move forward by many parties.

For my great grandmother
For my great grandfather
For my great grandfather
For my great grandfather
For my grandmother
For my grandmother
For my mother
For my auntie
For my auntie
For my uncle
For my uncle

My initiation reaction is to accept the apology, and as I said, it was a historic day. When reality comes back though, it was that: a day. The morning after the apology I was asked to speak on CBC Radio as an indigenous youth and what my thoughts were on the issue. I spoke of how it’s a good step to move forward, but in reality it will have very little effect. The residential schools were a monumental force in recent memory of indigenous people and of course it’s effects are still present, extremely strong. The apology may have come and gone but the Canadian government’s lack of response to it’s own apology to change policy is not surprising and expected.

The apology won’t give me my language.
The apology has not returned my land.
The apology does not recognize my nations right to be an autonomy people.
The apology does not give me my dead grandmothers back.
The apology does not restore balance to mine and many other dysfunctional families.
The apology does not end the continued racism on indigenous women, men, and people in this country.

There is much the apology does not do. “Thanks for saying sorry, but now can you give us back our land?” My non-Indigenous friend discussed the apology with me also, curious as to my response. He asked, “How is it that a people can move forward when they see their culture as traditions from the past?”. I responded with, “The residential school was something meant to ‘break the connection’. To our land, our language, our people, our everything. Moving forward does not mean turning back the hands on a clock, but picking up the tools my ancestors used. The same tools that worked for thousands of years, and still have relevance today. This means more then just “cultural” icons like songs and dances, and phrases in a dead language, but really living a lifestyle that is non-colonial.” I continued with, “The place that our societies, indigenous nations and Canadian civil society, can move forward is in the relationship dynamic of our peoples. The Indigenous-Settler relationship.”

A few years ago when I attended High School, I lamented about the abysmal instruction or curriculum on indigenous peoples history, and particularly Residential Schools. One single paragraph was dedicated to Residential schools. The British Columbia education system, and that of most of the world, is obvious inadequate. I understand more now that indigenous children and youth need to learn our own history. Simply put, a war two parts of “Canada”, happening on the other side of the continent, has little to do with my people. Learning about origins, reserve systems, and residential schools is entirely relevant. It’s this allowance of ignorance that breeds to the awful understand, but also the continual assimilation of indigenous people.

Schools to this day are entrenched in assimilation, but it’s not race based anymore, just culture-based. The bells, the desks, the teacher-dictators, and the slew of Euro-style educational paradigms dictate the epitome of “educated citizens”. Perhaps if settlers learned more about indigenous peoples existence, there would not be this silent racism among land reclamation and nation-identity. All indigenous history in public education is merely a point of view from European colonization. Anything else is only “information you need to know, so you can get the jist of colonization.” From colonial existence in an occupied country. What ever is talked about indigenous peoples political, societal, or religious, is all ‘past tense’. “The Kwakwaka’wakw people potlached during the winter time. These ceremonies were about the distribution of property and displaying ones wealth.” Wrong! So, so, so wrong! The potlatch is not about just “distributing ones property”, it is about giving of ones self to your people. About the supreme generosity we learned from the Creator when the Creator gave us his gifts. Language, conscience thought, song and dance. We potlatch to this day and it has the same meaning it did for our ancestors.

It’s something children and youth need to be raised with, simply to understand the predicament of our existence. To learn why that boys mother could never love except with a bottle or a fist. Realizing the connection in why that girl, and all her cousins, were sexually molested by their uncle, who also happens to be a so called “hereditary chief”. Why the pain of motherhood forced the alcoholic mother to flee in despair, leaving a legacy of abandonment, but only carrying on the path her grandmother did with her children too. Seeing the reasons a father and a son could never truly love each other, because one lacked the proper human responses to being human.

Connecting our historical trauma to the mission of colonization is a power point to make our people powerful again.

The generations to come are leading to a time when Residential schools with not be in recent memory. It’s why I tell my friends my age that this generation, the one I’m apart of, will play an instrumental role in the shape of the future. It will be our response to the act of residential schools, that will have the same intergenerational effects on indigenous peoples. Simply because our parents and grandparents could never have achieved what we’re capable of now. The sacrifice and decisions of our predecessors, to keep our culture alive by bringing the potlatch underground, by remembering the language they were raised with, knowing how to hunt, gather, and be on the land. That point in our history is having less and less of an effect on our lives as generations continue to come, except that we are either making a choice to become more colonized, or decolonizing more.

While some of the more liberal politicians will speak of “moving on”, I’m not so quick to join their failed bandwagon. Gibby Jacob of the Squamish Band Council speaks of how “If we don’t quit victimizing ourselves, we don’t release ourselves from the prison we keep ourselves in.” Playing the blame game in a reactionary stance like so many of our angry uncles, aunties, and past movers and shakers did created little in the path for future generations. Warriors act, fools react. The reactionary stances and tactics of band councils, FN political organizations, and FN politicians is an example of foolishness. I don’t believe in ‘blaming” anyone, of “victimizing” ourselves or anyone. The thought of holding something responsible though, is something worth considering. When we can identity and hold responsible the colonial forces in our lives and where they come from, then we can build that connection between an indigenous existence, and an indigenous person living a colonial experience.

Holding it responsible, not blame. We hold politicians style of deceit and lies in band politics responsible by dissolving a stupid political system and re-institute indigenous governance. We don’t allow ego-department heads to be “Intellectual Property Rights” dictators with our culture, history, and language, but actively learn and share our culture with OUR people. We restore balance to our community by coming together to creation action, not always reacting to the latest outrage.

The other liberal politicians will forgo any sort of real political change in our sense of belonging and move towards misguided ideas of “development” and “progress”. It’s why the AFN whines for more money, and why the 2010 Olympics is destroying the Squamish Nation. It’s where multiple court wars of attrition drive First Nations in to bankruptcy.

I wish to introduce an action, built in sustaining a way of life as an innovative path for our generation to accept our rights, our way of life, and our possibility to be empowered nations. Rooted in indigenous values, not with pompous lies of “traditionalism”. Think of it as a collective chant of a generation shouting a collective chant.

This action, what is it? It is this:
Searching out other like-minded people to create change in our nations.

It’s where we’ll decolonize the psychological effects of colonization, we’ll reconnect the disconnect like our land, spirituality, and history, to re-learn and breath life into a dead (almost extinct) language. This will be our generations collective response and action to the past few hundred years of occupation, oppression, and tyranny on all parts. They say sorry, and we reverse the damage of Residential school, reserves, Indian Act, colonization.
June 1, 2008

Reconciliation and What We Give Up

This a response to my friend Chris Corrigan's latest post Reconciliation, peace and generative relationships.  I started writing a reply on his blog, but I'm unsure after writing it if it's all directed at him, or someone else?  Hmmm, interesting.

------------------------

I, like you, am curious how this plays out. My gut reaction was a skeptical one. This talk of "reconciliation," on all parts, feels utterly a lie. I didn't see it coming from indigenous peoples, at the very most, Indigenous politicians MAYBE, but mostly from governmental perspective on the issue. I find all the dialogue on reconciliation is a topdown conversation between First Nations and Canadian government. What more is I'm finding we, the indigenous peoples, are being requested or in some cases, forced to surrender or "compromise" more of who we are and what we own. That's the painted veil of "Reconciliation".

In this whole game, I see nothing coming from the Canadian civil society or Canadian government to compromise itself, or radically change itself. I say radically because what has been required of indigenous people in this country is freaking radical (pre-contact to early colonization, then contemporary colonization). I don't see either of those factors changing itself into something more balanced with power. I say power because that's the dynamic of this. Indigenous peoples power and Canadian government power. In the relationship between those two, the Canadian government wields way more power over us, and is rarely letting go of that. The only factor, so far, willing to concede partial truths is the Courts. Only with an adequate risk assessment is a government willing to commit to something meaningful.

As for Canadian civil society, I see little happening in reconciliation, and I fear very little solidarity building coming from this. Canadian civil society, either out of arrogance in their ignorance, or deep-rooted racism, is not willing to face up to the facts that their existence is predicated on the colonization of indigenous peoples, to this day. Arguments of "That happened a long time ago. Get over it." Or "That wasn't my ancestors who did those awful things to your great grandfather, my parents just immigrated here." Are things that pop up frequently. The absolving of guilt on their part is uninspiring. Will they admit or realize that in order for them to live their lives, have what they have, and be who they are, it is all built on something stolen or plundered. "Their" Canadian economic resources (our indigenous land), their economy (our indigenous land), and their existence as a people.

I don't see reconciliation accomplishing anything but asking us to give up more. We've compromised enough already.

But I will also say this...

I think that this will and can bring meaningful resolution to those who are still alive. I heard the stories from elders themselves of what happened in the residential schools and I seen the effects it had on my family, directly. For those alive, it can bring closure. I say this, because my grandmother said it to me.

The information gathered, could be useful. It depends on what is produced. Although I'm critical of the intention behind it, and can't help but feel myopic about the idea of doing this, I hope that something can come out of this.

I have more news to follow on this coming up about things related to this. In the meantime, I will do my best to wait, listen, and see what comes out of this. Although while I'm waiting, I intend to have idea's to do something I feel is necessary and a need in my community. Create a new legacy to the residential school system: where a generation feels up to the task of ridding ourselves of it's diabolical influence and start living healthy empowered indigenous lives.
April 8, 2008

Once a Black Robe, Always a Black Robe

The St'at'imc Runner, February 2008 issue
Report by Kerry Coast.
Printed in The St'at'imc Runner, February 2008 issue
[Note: This was not written by me.]

Former church minister solicits Survivors' stories, misuses names. Some Residential School Survivors have shared stories of abuses they suffered in the church-run schools. When a personal disclosure is given in confidence, it should be kept private.

Kevin Annett is a former minister with the United Church. Annett, who has recently claimed that he is Metis, runs a website called "Hidden from History," and has made a film called "Unrepentant." He had a radio show on Vancouver's Co-operative Radio station. (Vancouver BC) Also he has started an organization he calls the "Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada."

The subject of all of these media programs is the genocide against native people, but specifically the Indian Residential School system. Much of the accusations he makes against the church and Canada in regards to their role in covering up the horrors of residential schools can be verified by Survivors. However, Annett has used peoples' private disclosures without their consent, he has misrepresented people on radio and in print, and has betrayed the trust of many Survivors by using their stories in various ways without their permission.

James Craven, a professor of economics at Clark College in Vancouver, Washington, talks about the abuses of trust and truth being carried out by Mr Annett, who has recently taken to calling himself "Eagle Strong
Voice." According to Craven, a long time friend of the late Elder Harriet Nahanee from Squamish, Annett published her testimonies that she had told him, but without her knowledge or permission. Before her
passing, Nahanee circulated a letter to this effect. The late Kitty Sparrow also wrote a similar letter about her experience with Annett. It is unclear why someone would do these things to people who have surely
had enough suffering for one lifetime.

There may be a clue in that the subject of the movie "Unrepentant" quickly turns from that of Survivors' stories to the story of Kevin Annett. Yet that story remains something of a mystery owing to contradictory claims and reports. Annett claims that he was dismissed from United Church ministerial duties when he started asking his
superiors what was being done about residential school crimes. Another dissident minister from the same church contradicts that, saying Annett never mentioned residential schools until well after he had been
dismissed.

Survivors desperately want to be heard. They want to tell their story to someone. A person who claimed to be seeking justice from the church and Canada, and had himself been a self-appointed representative of god in
the United Church, would be in an ideal position to gain the trust of a wounded soul. James Craven's mother, a Blackfoot woman, was victimized at a residential school in Idaho, and actually committed suicide
because, as she put it, the demons had come home to roost. "The thing that really gets me going is that the cause is sacred. The things he says about murder and genocide are true. That's why you don't want him
involved with this cause - because the cause gets impeached with him," explains James. "In my protected opinion, he exhibits the characteristics of malignant narcissism and psychopathology."

Helen Michel is a Carrier Sekani woman who suffered terribly in residential school. She met Annett some years ago, and disclosed to him some stories of residential school impacts in her home reservation community. "Kevin said a lot of things on the Co-Op radio, apparently he said we said those things, but he twisted around our stories. No one's ever given him permission to repeat their stories, he just uses what he can get. When we confronted him about it, he started saying I and my husband were RCMP informants." Annett claims on his website that he believes Helen and her husband Frank are undercover agents from a division known as "RCMP-E," and that their codenames are "Redman 1 and Redman 2." Annett has also stated on his website that Michel assaulted him in public by running into him with a scooter. No charges have come before a court on this alleged incident.

Mrs Michel spoke about these experiences to this newspaper because she wants other Survivors to be warned of what has happened in the past. "We've been working on human rights and land rights issues for 20 years.
He made our credibility go downhill after we started hanging out with Kevin, and we soon found out we weren't the only ones."
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)